Wednesday, March 03, 2010

'Life lessons are learnt by crashing and dying'; Times Online, April 2008

The first time I heard Grand Theft Auto mentioned was when some friends managed to network GTA, the first one, in our school’s computer room. Too many lunchtimes were then lost to our “maths homework”.

The blood was excessive, the top-down people barely recognisable as such. The game was already a few years old: in game years that’s practically an antique. But even then, you weren’t forced to trudge through the exposition, and set-piece fluff. I didn’t have to do the drug-running mission, save my “buddy”. I could just hoon around on a motorbike, crash and then die. Life lessons were learnt.

A few years later, playing GTA IIIon my own, I again ignored the plot. I cruised across Liberty City, causing trouble, jumping ramps, barely touching the story, which is a shame: when you got around to it, it wasn’t half bad.

Oh, and the radio. It proved that in-game music didn’t have to be immediately muted and replaced by your own music collection. It suited the game: the radio channels pumped parody hit after parody hit, and a few genuine ones, if you could spot them. But the chat radio has always been my favourite, including characters from the games, and the various other freaks that talk radio often draws.

GTA III changed every other game. Skateboarding games were now “sand-box” games; there weren’t levels, it was all just . . . there.

I think I may have spent more time working in a taxi or ambulance than as a crim in GTA games, but maybe that says more about me than the game. All the controversy that became associated with the series mostly flew over my head. Plainly put, it’s not a kid’s game. When GTA III’s inevitable sequels came, the similarities, and pointless window dressing (literally, dressing your character) put me off. But GTA IV, being able to chase my mates down a road in a fire engine again, online, I’m sold. (Or it’s an offer I can’t refuse.)


Friday, January 19, 2007

The Guardian: Music Blog- Chart Attack

Chris Moyles is championing Billie's 1999 single Honey To The Bee on his radio show, helping to push it up today's charts. Is this funny, or unfair?

Billie's Honey To The Bee was launched in 1999. Back then, it made a fairly respectable No 3 in the singles chart. So how is it now enjoying seventh place in this week's iTunes chart, and expected to storm into the official Top 40 chart at the weekend?

There are two reasons: one logical, the other not so. First, at the start of this year, the chart rules were changed allowing downloads to be counted even if a single was not available in shops. So the charts will be far more representative of all music actually bought, right? Well, changes have been pretty minor so far. Snow Patrol's single Chasing Cars, released back in July last year, managed to claw into the modified chart's Top 10 via slow-burn downloads in the first week. Unsigned bands such as Koopa have also benefited - they managed No 31 last week.

The second reason is, well, Chris Moyles. Wielding a national audience, the radio DJ has championed the late nineties single on his show and encouraged listeners to download it - since first suggesting it on Monday, Honey To The Bee has rocketed up the chart. The breakfast team also touted a handful of other songs, which have barely touched the chart, but have nabbed sales from the exposure - including a karaoke cover of The Minder theme, which scraped into, then out of, the Top 100 downloads on iTunes.

So why is he doing it? On air, Moyles has said that the new chart rules were exciting, but ridiculous - and he's clearly putting that theory to the test. And if you had a big ego and an audience of just under 7 million, wouldn't you try to see how much you could manipulate public opinion?

PopJustice points out that only 0.7% of his audience have actually downloaded the song, so it only proves a certain amount of listener loyalty. But why Billie? You could say it's pretty damn funny to push a randomly selected, pretty mediocre eight-year-old pop song into the Top 40. It may not be the best Billie song, but if alleged sample-stealing cash-ins can rocket up the chart, then why not this?

Some cynics think that friend of the show Billie might be in on it. Apparently, she's already working on a third album - is this all part of her publicity campaign? And if it is this easy to influence the charts, are they even valid any more?

The Guardian: TV Blog. Has Desperate Housewives lost the plot?


Have Channel 4 made the right choice in keeping Desperate Housewives, and losing Lost? If the first episode of the new series is anything to go by, I think not.


By the end of this New Year fortnight, we'll have seen the start of Ugly Betty, new OC, new Battlestar Galactica, even new ER, and we've already seen the wife-burying return of the Wisteria wives.

The last series was dull, suffered from excess plotline fluff and perhaps even some latent racism, but this week the double episode managed to bring in 3.6 million viewers.

Last year, Channel 4 faced a tough decision between buying hair-care advertisers' favourite Desperate Housewives and the baffling Lost. It may have worked commercially (for now), but on the evidence of the new series they chose the wrong one.

Like Desperate Housewives, Sex And The City was kryptonite to many (especially men), but at least it gave us some empowered women with slightly interesting lives, not the utterly overwhelmed weak-kneed type we see in Susan and Gabrielle.

So if you're not remotely interested in the fashion, increasingly cling-film faces or over-decorated houses and gardens, only two things make the show worth watching. One is the brilliantly buttoned-up Bree Van Der Kamp (who in the last episode went to the doctor fearing a stroke, which turned out to be her first orgasm). Then there's The Mostly Serious One, Lynette, whose main purpose is to act, maintain the (usually pretty boring) storyline and keep the whole thing remotely realistic.

We need these two as a bulwark against the pulpy plot twists and pop-up characters seemingly plucked from old-lady mystery books featuring topless menservants on the cover. How many times can two women question everyone about mysterious men, and accuse them of murder, or abduction, or anything else they might think up?

So what else is new this series? Most seem to agree, not much. Another wife was killed and buried. Oh, and Bree's getting involved with another nutter that may have done it. She's married, to new-character-therefore-a-baddie Orson, who also mowed down Susan's Mike in the finale last season.

In the USA, they'll be watching Episode 11 this Sunday; the internet is filled with spoilers and episode clips. Bizarrely, critics over there seem to be excited and positive about the new series, and it's already been nominated for a handful of awards.

Looking into the predictable future, Orson may not be all bad, Gabrielle will get back with her husband, and someone from someone's past will do something. But where are the Applewhite family, who underpinned the whole of the last series?

Lost is meant to be inexplicable, even incomprehensible, but Desperate Housewives is both dull (the suburban setting) and filled with gaping plot-holes taken from a panicky potboiler. How much longer can they get away with it?

Thursday, November 23, 2006

The Guardian: Technobile- Unpimp my 'board

(First published in The Guardian, Thursday November 23, 2006)


I love my small, multi-talented laptop. Yet while our laptops continue to shrink and streamline, the humble desktop keyboard is getting increasingly overweight and overcomplicated.

I now find it a bit sad to sit down at a desktop PC and dislocate my hands across a gargantuan slab of keys and buttons and switches. Above the standard Qwerty and numberpad arrangement, this packaged-with-the-desktop Packard Bell number has more than 12 buttons that will supposedly help me with my computing activities.

I'll admit that a few buttons deserve to be there: mute and standby shortcuts are always handy. Yet the rest are pretty rubbish and some of them downright pointless. This is because most of them won't actually work. They are allocated to work only with Packard Bell's proprietary programs, most of which I uninstalled immediately. One button links to the Packard Bell website.
Right, well that's certainly above YouTube on my bookmark list, oh yes.

Above the row of function keys is a bizarre set of clipart-grade pictures. These range from a question mark (a link to a search engine?) to piggy banks, airplanes, shopping trolleys and one that looks like a silver-service waiter.
I have no idea what that last one's for. It probably linked to some long defunct website that was snatched up for millions by a pack of venture capitalists.

All of these can only be accessed via a function key awkwardly placed on the outside of the control key. Any half-decent typist will end up tapping this instead of the control keys, which can really irritate if you're cutting and pasting text from one document to another.

Fortunately, with most of these keyboards, you can reassign those extra buttons to launch websites and applications you regularly use - but only if you've either have the software that came with the keyboard or can navigate your way to a set of drivers. (Why's there no shortcut key to that, eh? Steering wheel icon, anyone?)

Mice are following a similar trend for pimped-out excess, with many riddled with specific buttons for launching programs, skipping music tracks and the like. Does it really take that long to drag your mouse across the screen?

It may save time if you lovingly mapped each button to certain tools in, say, Adobe Photoshop or Microsoft Word, but why not learn the shortcut combinations already in the application?

These extra buttons just increase the odds that I'm going to cock it up and force my computer regularly to spit out a wave of unwanted programs and websites.

Can I unpimp my keyboard? Is there a key for that?

TECHNORATI


Saturday, November 18, 2006

The Guide; The Hard Sell- Optivita

(First published in The Guide, The Guardian, Saturday November 18, 2006)


Ray Winstone is warning me about cholesterol. I may not have the thin slender frame of Peter Crouch, but if they've resorted to using Winstone to tell me what to eat, I know it's time to go for a jog. Now. And for a couple of days.

As he sweats along the street, he rants about health advice and silent tuts at some poor guy eating his lunch. "What's this guy like, eh? Cloggin' up his arteries with all that coal-est-eh-roll!" Wait a minute, this is Ray "I'm-the-fucking-daddy" Winstone, and he's seems to be telling us to eat a high-fibre breakfast.

He's the one with the pipe in Scum, he's the one that roughs them up in The Departed. He's also the one that struts around in a pair of downright nasty, ill-fitting trunks in Sexy Beast. He is certainly not the man you go to for dietary advice, and he's still giving off a sincerely threatening odour in this advert.

"There's a bit of a nanny culture fing going on," he warns us. My God, give that man a prize, he's made a breakthrough. "Those people are telling us what's good for us! What gives them the right? Get 'em!"

He trots up and down Trafalgar Square, with a copy of the day's Evening Standard in tow. Ray is just a regular Londoner, like a few of you, so what should you be eating? Naturally, his cereal, you'd assume. But he's not asking you to buy it. Not Ray Winstone. You don't need to advise people when menace works so much better.

He confusingly walks away from the newsstand then back to it, and shrugs to the camera, "It's up to you to choose to reduce cholesterol ... or not." Now that sounded like a threat to me.


TECHNORATI



Saturday, November 11, 2006

The Guardian: Office Makeover- Desk-ive Greetings

(First published in the Guardian, Monday September 25, 2006)

Start preparing now and you could have a Christmas bash worthy of the season

Right. Enough of this summer business, thank you very much. It's time to get festive. Less than three months to the Christmas party, and so much work needed to pull off a substandard disco and buffet combo. Please let me kill myself over the low-grade catering now.
Early into October, a taskforce will be created to discuss "ideas". Sadly, the makeshift committee will be presided by the tyrant responsible for last year's disaster - with new ideas rebuffed as too pricey, too complicated or "just not Christmassy enough".

Days of negotiation follow until, it's "agreed" that the party will be exactly like last year, (a pattern so familiar that the box of decorations from 1985 will return, once again, to hang in office cubicles and doorways).

So what do we do? Who can sort out this mess? You, my friend! It's time to get down for the sake of streamers and Santa. Get involved in the planning process, and be brutally honest. Explain what you thought went wrong last year and start suggesting improvements.

The National Society for the Prevention of Accidents and TUC are on hand to help us out. Their guide to office parties suggests that, "it might be best to leave out the mistletoe. Cases of sexual harassment at parties are often attempted to be excused as 'a bit of fun' rather than a workplace issue. Case law suggests this is a very fine line." Not that jolly, but at least mistletoe expenses can be transfered to the booze budget.

The guide also suggests moving the party outside of the office, away from tedium of photocopied bottoms and extension cords to trip over. Increased safety aside, it also means avoiding the gaudy festive decor and microwaved party snacks of the office-based soiree. It might even be worthwhile, dare I say, contracting out for your organisers, and leaving it all in the capable hands of someone who does this sort of thing daily. This will also mean no one will bitch about being at a work bash sober.

The atmosphere of a Christmas party is closely tied to whether everyone gets on. An annual party with £20 worth of supermarket-brand booze and some party poppers may not instil the festive spirit into anyone. Try having a social event with your work pals now. The reason could be to discuss the Christmas party, but it's really an excuse to get together out of working hours. Suggest something to base it around, perhaps the local pub quiz - anything to make sure the end-of-year party isn't the first time you meet anyone from the second floor.

And if all these changes fail to materialise, spare a thought for those unfortunate souls that don't even get the chance to drink the company's coffers dry. Whinge about the Christmas party all you like, but at least you have one. Alas, for some, it will be just another week in the office.

TECHNORATI

The Guardian: Office Makeover- Assess Stress

(First published in The Guardian, Monday September 18, 2006)

Staff assessments don't have to be stressful - just keep it nice and informal

It's the word that strikes fear into the hearts of offices across the country. Appraisals. They take many different shapes, ranging from that two-hour-long "informal chat" with the boss, to pages of forms that look like you're applying for the job you already have.
The forms needed to be returned last Friday, but in a planning masterstroke, they have arrived on the Wednesday afternoon, dated for the beginning of last year. You cobble together a few paragraphs of training received, strengths and weaknesses, future plans, but there's barely a chance to write something that sounds remotely worthwhile and genuine.

While you glumly tackle the first page, the tempo of the office shifts. Everyone around you is a bit on edge. What's going to happen? Are they shrinking the team? Is there a promotion? What did you write on yours? Left it blank? Was I supposed to?

Will that box the area of a fun-sized Mars bar be able to house all the things you've done in the last few months? Perhaps, but a box even smaller won't explain what you aim to do in the next 12.

Appraisals should be a great opportunity. They should help the boss discover who's good, who's bad and who's just plain lazy. But they most often result in a retread of last year's appraisal, with a liberal dose of new buzzwords.

An effective leader should be able to note some of your strengths and weaknesses, but, with self-appraisal, the hard work has been done for them. In the interview, they can pore over this cheat-sheet, recite back to you what you've written and generally waste everybody's time.

There are few ways this whole process can be made less painful and more useful, apart from simply scrapping them. As uncomfortable as appraisals often are, they remain a necessary evil.

Instead of feeling around in the dark, employers can use the experience to explain what they are using these appraisals for, and what they are looking for in you. What qualities are needed to progress in the company? Are we actually looking to get promoted? What skills can be learned on the job?

But a sweaty meeting room is hardly the place for a relaxed discussion. How much better would things be if they were moved out of the office and into a local cafe?

And, while we're about wholesale reform, discussions should be limited to an hour - reducing the number of reiterated points and general awkwardness. Appraisals should mean evaluating your progress and planning how to improve your role, not hassling you about your mistakes and flaws. Appraisals can be constructive, and a chance to praise what's been done well. They should leave you knowing your job better than before that sinister form dropped on to your desk.

TECHNORATI

The Guardian: Technobile- USB Joking

(First published in The Guardian, Thursday November 9, 2006)

Another USB lava lamp? You shouldn't have. Really. Because I don't have any spare ports left

As the nights get colder and people begin to stockpile gift catalogues, I fear the worst. If you're known to distant friends and relatives as The One Who Likes Computers, then you too can look forward to receiving some depressingly inane USB accessories. Catalogues are stuffed full of everything a technophile could never want, and thanks to the miracles of mass production, most of them fall neatly, and sadly, within the price range of the average Secret Santa gift-swap at work.
"I'm sure he'd love the mini-rocket launcher I got him."

"Look, a little light-up Christmas tree - that should cheer up his desk."

So you got me a USB lava lamp? You shouldn't have. No, really. Really.

I understand that the subject of unwanted Christmas presents is a tricky one, and that I should be grateful that I get anything, but if someone gives me another novelty USB memory stick, I might throw it at their head.

Because of course I didn't really want the 2GB memory stick that I bought myself a few months back. I think sushi shapes and 64MB of USB memory go together so very well.

Oh look! It's a wiggly LED light dongle! Completely redundant if your keyboard is cunningly positioned in front of the monitor. I have a laptop.

If you work in an office, then it doesn't matter if your work is IT-related or not. Those who struggle to think of an interesting present know that if you work in an office, then you love to drink tea or coffee. So obviously you desperately need a USB mug warmer. Yes, you'll finally be able to keep your drink in lukewarm purgatory.

Does it really take that much effort and time to make a fresh brew that you'd prefer to be stuck at your desk with a sub-par cuppa? Just ditch the aged drink and make a new one.

It gets worse. You - well, not you, someone else - can buy a set: USB-powered cup warmer, body massager and keyboard vacuum. That's a gift set that sucks in both senses of the word.

With all of these objets donnés sucking, blinking, heating and vibrating, my desk looks less like a workspace and more like a preschool computer from Fisher-Price.

Not that all of them can be plugged in at the same time, as I have only four USB ports, which I use for such frivolous activities as printing, scanning and downloading digital photos.

You know, the sort of things you'd use a computer for ...

TECHNORATI

Thursday, August 17, 2006

The Guardian: Technobile- My wireless woes

(First published in the Guardian, Technology Guardian, Thursday August 17, 2006)
Battery manufacturers must be rubbing their hands with the advent of wireless peripherals


Wireless keyboards and wireless mice should mean technical progress. Freedom for the desk-bound. Looking cooler than your average boxed-with-computer set, and typically dressed in jet black, robotic metallic or a bit of both, the mouse is now unconstrained from the cable, and can scamper around your desk like its rodent namesake.
The wireless keyboard can now act as a gigantic television remote. If, like a minority of PC owners, your computer is your "media centre", it makes sense to be able to watch, rewind and mute from the comfort of your bed or couch - if you can balance the monster on your lap. A keyboard won't get lost so easily down the side of the sofa. Genuine progress for the humble mouse and keyboard combo! But it's not, and it isn't even close.

Why would people have any need for a wireless keyboard? You can already buy a remote control for your PC that will miraculously fit in your palm. The keyboard is not going to escape away from under your fingertips.

Yes, it may be amazing that you can type away from your desk, but that won't help when you are so far away from the screen that you are incapable of reading a blur that resembles what has been typed.

Security fears are also a hidden extra with your high-tech upgrade, as a wireless keyboard will surreptitiously transmit your every keystroke to any unscrupulous types who care to look for your bank details and passwords. Within a few days, the unchained gadgets will be entirely unreliable. The mouse will behave erratically even with a full charge. You will pound the mouse up and down as your cursor begins to trace the outline of a dilapidated snowflake. And you were not drawing a dilapidated snowflake.

Depending on the frequency of use, a week later the mouse will be completely dead; a few days later and the keyboard will join it. If sharing your computer, you will realise that the reason that no one's used the computer recently is that both devices need two to four batteries replaced, again. A few more changes later, and you are buying multipacks of Duracell just for the chance to use your PC for a week.

Finally, after one purchase too many, these "wireless wonders" will end up dumped under your computer desk alongside the photo-quality paper and a box of floppy disks.

You will find yourself going back to that yellow-white keyboard - which is so old that it doesn't have a windows key - and rifling through a box of old mice trying to find the one that still has its rubber trackball.

TECHNORATI

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Interview: Perry Bible Fellowship

(This is a preview of my interview with Perry Bible Fellowship creator, Nicholas Gurewich. It will soon be published in next week's edition of York Vision, The University of York's student paper)
A tubby man arches his spoon back as he raises his hand to his mouth: “Food fight!”
His pasty jowls are warped by the force of a slap. The view pans back to show the wannabe food-fighter, berated by a fellow aid-worker.

Both are stood next to an aid truck, as several gaunt children around them queue for food. It’s funny, but it’s uncomfortable, but it’s funny. There’s some deep and meaningfuls in there about world aid and western excess, too...
It’s pretty easy to start writing about the Perry Bible Fellowship. Yet explaining one of the strips , (and the he-bitch-man-slap to the mind that accompanies the final picture) sadly doesn’t do justice to the way it delivers its ideas, as style flits from children book illustration to elaborate vistas.

Typically dark, occasionally brutal, always unexpected these aren’t Garfield/’Animals! Kids! Aren’t They Funny?’ comics. Subjects span from childhood stories, to robot knights, computer game parody, sexual perversion, disturbed kids and space-based drama.
”I'd take a moment to hammer Garfield as loathsome mind-dung, but you know, I think it gave me a smile a few months ago. There was a good gag with a spider.”

PBF’s creator, Nicholas Gurewich isn’t, at least wasn’t, a cartoonist by trade. He’s actually a film-maker, and film school graduate, where the PBF seed was planted.
“While I was a freshman at university, my friend and I constructed a comic during art history class, found it funny, and then submitted it to our school paper.”
The strip was a creative outlet that was both cheaper and far less limited.
“Many PBFs are simplified versions of short films I would have loved to shoot if I had access to dinosaurs and angels.”

Characters often come to a grisly end, but surprisingly the comics aren’t intentionally brutal. “Do I feel brutal? Not really. If I can get myself to kill a fly, I usually feel pretty bad about it. But life is brutal, and comedy demands that you show life the way it is. Comedy invites a person to breathe in the mystery of life, drown in it, and have to swim to the surface.”

Each strip or scene is self-contained- often the whole world is setup for the gag. Next week’s strip will have nothing to do with the last.
The only things resembling a regular person are the ghostly outline drawings that represent the inhabitants of the fellowship.

“The simplified PBF folk are a default. I usually conceive ideas with them in mind.

“If I need to show a tongue, earring, or high amount of detail, I depart from that style, find a new one, and reconfigure the gag to make details enjoyable.”
The strips will usually take more meaning or impact from the style. One strip shows a lucky boy who wins two tickets round ‘The Fantastic Factory’.
The tickets come hidden in a pack of sausages and he is invited to tour the slaughterhouse hosted by the Wonka-esque factory owner. The style is not dissimilar to Quentin Blake, once the illustrator for Roald Dahl.

Part of its appeal could be that there aren’t many comics like PBF out there. “I don't think many people are willing to make sacrifices to their personality. You really become an abnormal person at some point if you regularly conduct pieces that you care more about than your real life.”

The PBF is now printed in papers across the world. In addition to its recent inclusion to The Guardian’s G2 section every Friday, it appears in The New York Press, men’s magazine Maxim in both Britain and… Czechoslovakia. “Translations occur where they're necessary. I enjoy making it easy on them though. Comics without dialogue are very pleasing to me. I got to see a copy of the job they did with "No Survivors" (where dead bodies spell out a marriage proposal) and was pretty impressed with their Photoshop work.”

The strip has also helped Gurewich secure film shorts on MTV2, and he is in discussions with several US television studios, though this has been more difficult.
“There have been delays in the specifics of that production. I hope this is simply the earmark of something so brilliant, that it requires a lot of planning, but I fear we simply don't see eye-to-eye on a couple of things.”

Fans are drawn to his website, which has soared from 200,000 hits at the start of the year, to over 800,000 last month and money from published strips is “much more than I need to sustain my existence”. There’s also a book in the works. Why did it explode like this?
“It's always made me laugh. I'm not terribly surprised that it makes other people laugh too.”


ANATOMY OF A MIME
“I'm really liking the one about the Mime City lately- it leaves much to be imagined. I think it also sums up one of my many unoriginal philosophies about the universe.”



“I wanted to do a short film about a bowling mime who knocked bowling pins down with only implied action. Then I got the idea to push it further; to show his pantomime affecting another person, even to the other person's detriment (an unwilling, possibly even subconscious participation on their part).
An incredible concept such as this would probably require some kind of bizarre, multi-mime location where such interaction was the norm: Mime City. Why would they be congregated? A political gathering of some kind. Would there be talking? No. It would be sterile. Straightforward. Direct. With lots of stripes and shapes. Black and white, with a little bit of colour: like a mime.”

Perry Bible Fellowship is published each Friday in the Guardian's G2 section. Check www.thepbf.com for past comics.


Technorati



Thursday, July 13, 2006

The Guardian: Technobile- Mobile battery bother

(First published in the Guardian, Technology Guardian, Thursday March 23, 2006)

Mobile phone features are just excess baggage when they eat up power reserves and reduce your talk time

There's nothing quite like getting a new phone. Only a few things are as satisfying as prising a mint mobile from its packaging. Until you get to using it, erratically, in 10-hour bursts.
When it came to choosing a phone, I found some features more important than others. A camera was handy, but ultimately unnecessary: my digital camera will do the same, with flash, in more detail with less blur. Similarly, there are devices dedicated to playing hundreds of MP3s, so phones that will play 10 tracks are pointless.

But all this excess didn't matter. The reception was clear, the screen vibrant, and it didn't shame me to be seen talking into it, unlike the heavy square-ish monstrosity it was to replace.

The next day, I admired its petite frame and slender curves. Sadly, I could barely scrape a day of use before the battery began to bleep for a recharge. Not good when you are waiting for those big important calls at the end of the day.

Each evening, as I leave to make my way home, I call ahead and as there are only precious minutes to tell friends and family anything, conversations take a urgent tone - "I'm-on-my-way-now, I'll-be-about-10-minutes-OK-bye."

Yes, I could take the phone charger everywhere, and charge it up as I went about my day, but I shouldn't need to. My mobile phone should just be, well, mobile.

I have gone through all the motions to improve its performance. The Bluetooth is always off, the screen brightness is on its lowest ebb and the luxurious symphonic ringtones are quiet, bordering on silent. I occasionally play the games, but barely touch the music player or camera functions.

Yet if I take a handful of calls through the day, I'll need to plug it in before I go out in the evening. This is the second phone I have bought with stamina issues and, if anything, my latest handset demands more recharging than the old one.

And thanks to the annual giveaway that is mobile phone contract renewal, I have noticed that for every new function stitched to the sides of the latest phone, we lose more minutes of standby time. Some of the plusher handsets even come with two batteries as standard, in an indulgent attempt to gloss over the problem.

There must be simpler ways for manufacturers to create an aesthetically pleasing handset with a battery that will push to 24 hours. That is really all I need. If it doesn't do that, what is the point of being able to Bluetooth text messages to a printer? Who would do that? No one. So why give me the option to do so? Please, get rid of it, and give me more talk time.

TECHNORATI

The Guardian: Technobile- Fax Machines

(First published in the Guardian, Technology Guardian, Thursday February 2, 2006)

Why do fax machines still exist when the recyclable electrons of scanners do the job so much better?

What the hell are fax machines still doing here? It's 2006, not 1986; there are scanners at the same price, if not lower. Hasn't everyone heard of the scanner, with its wonderful precision? I don't enjoy having pictures faxed to me, with Crimewatch-like blur, or looking like they have been taken during a lunar eclipse or solar meltdown. Scanners are also USB-friendly, and require only internet access. There's none of this "What's the number for your fax machine again?" or "Naah, phone calls and faxes both come through this number" or "It's still not working."
The fact is it's barely ever working. Fax machines are the Graeme le Saux of office appliances, barely managing to scrape nine months of good service, even if you feed it replacement toner and paper on demand. It is probably also best to schedule the coffee break when sending anything through it, as faxing technology trudges toward the speed of a 56k modem.

This minimal technology is often encased in huge shrines to off-white, regardless of whether they were manufactured before or after 1992. Why am I still using one? Are some people convinced it's secure? Is my signature any more safe because it's on a fax machine?

That's the poor object's usual excuse. We pray no hacker will be able to intercept this document as they might an email attachment, but not only are signatures just as easy to forge, but confidentiality is thrown out the window, because it is usually the lowest minions in the workplace who collect, check and distribute faxes.

Now, aided by the rise of internet spam, I get fax spam for cars, medicines and new fax machines. Obviously, there must be a reason why faxes remain on that distant desk in the corner. In 2004, around 1.5m fax machines were sold in the US alone, while manufacturers have taken to bolting fax machines to your printer/scanner/copier/answerphone/blender, which propagates the problem, as no one wants to be left unable to fax those really important orders. Sneaky gits.

Dare I even mention the paper wastage and the expensive sticky cartridges? That email of unscented, 100% recyclable electrons could easily have carried the message. Yet I still use the monster, even when fax-to-web services, and the reverse, are available on the internet.

Sadly, the teeth-grinding bleat of the fax machine at work continues to set me on edge. If I'm near the beige beast, I listen to colleagues cheerfully tapping away at the dial keys, getting it wrong, once, twice, three times, before they turn to me: "I can't remember, do I have to dial three first?"

The Guardian: Why I love...Japanese t-shirt folding

(First published in the Guardian, G2, Tuesday June 28, 2005)

I didn't want to be the one to tell you this, but your mother has taught you wrong. That's not how you should fold a T-shirt. First found floating around the internet about a year or so ago, there's an inspired new Japanese technique that will shake off our tired western concept of folding.

A quick Google search will find the video I'm raving about.

It may be one of the lamest party tricks you'll ever see, but it is, nevertheless, fast and impressive. I have fallen in love with this apparently effortless folding style, aka wardrobe origami. And at least this kind of origami won't nick your thumb.

I can make a pretty mean paper frog, but this is on a completely different level. It will shave minutes off your folding time, and, you never know, may also impress certain lady friends.

Here's how it works: the T-shirt is laid on the floor, and by pinching it at the "nipple point" on its far side and then grabbing the nearest side seam with the other hand, the folder performs a smooth series of folds, inversions and flips. The end result is a perfectly folded tee, perhaps followed by a gratuitous stylistic flourish. Simple. Or so you might think .

It's actually quite difficult to get the hang of it - it feels a bit like learning to tie your shoelaces all over again. Fold it here, pull that corner, grab the collar ... no, wait that isn't right ... try it the other way ... et voila: a crumpled mess of cotton.

I am sightly ashamed to admit it, but the zen-like satisfaction to be gained from a pile of crisply folded clothes has left me rather obsessed. Friends have told me that once you master the technique, you'll never go back.

This must be a case of them rubbing it in, because they know that I still haven't nailed it. But when I do (and when I find a technique for shirts as well), I will truly be the master of my wardrobe.

Travel: Brussels for Easter. Not the veg.

It's a bit late, but some of the pictures are bloody awesome...
Anyway,Belgium. It has waffles drenched in banana, caramel sauce and cream. It has chips submerged in a bucket of mayonnaise. Audrey Hepburn was Belgian, but so is Jean-Claude Van Damme. It’s an odd place...

To begin, don't make the mistake of travelling on Eurostar when hung-over. This wasn’t helped by my “random” body search and having to unpack my bag for Customs, looking ashamed, with good reason, as they unloaded a copy of Nuts, and an nasty-looking candle-holder, a ‘gift’ for friends in Brussels.

They then proceeded to 'swab' my bag with what looked like those free clothes you get with a new pair of glasses. That was quite disturbing. But I was pushed onwards by the promise of gooey sugary waffley treats while staying for a few days in Brussels.
We successfully negotiated the check-in lounge, the train, and the metro. (Brussels’ petit version of the London Underground.)

And it was cold. The winds cut through you like anywhere in Yorkshire, and I was stupidly hoping for sunshine and temperatures above 6 oC.

It is easy to fall in hyperbole or cliché, but I don’t care. Brussels is an odd mix of other capital cities in Europe, and seems to cram Western Europe into one city. Not too shocking, as Brussels draws the influence of member countries of NATO’s European headquarters, alongside housing the EU commission.

Buildings and groups of flats are either huge or gigantic, while cathedrals and other landmarks pop up everywhere. The city is also peppered by huge cartoon vistas on the sides of buildings, some with Belgian comic legend, Tintin.

Sadly, there wasn’t enough time to visit the Comic Museum, my companions seemed beyond uninterested at the suggestion of walking around looking at cartoons and old comic books.

The breadth of what to do draws comparisons to London, and there were multiple concerts, exhibitions and museums, though the Lace museum was not likely to draw in the crowds.

When in Brussels, we drank, regularly, beer. With several breweries across the capital, though not many were open for tours, we were able to try several types of beer.

The favourites use ranged through the trip from the mainstream Hoegarden to the more obscurely flavoured raspberry cherry and strawberry beers, which even convinced the women in our party to abandon the house white. Good for them.

On the first night, we scraped our inebriated feet around the city in search of fireworks that were to take place in the capital centre. Except that there are multiple interpretations of this centre, resulting in a high-speed chase, past statues, serious-looking buildings and, oddly, a glass elevator.
You can imagine the road map looking like a scribble as we went over and under bridges, walking around and around in circles, and seeming never to walk down the same street twice.

The major tourist magnet is the Grand Place, and stone-floored square the size of a football pitch, still dwarfed in scale by the guild houses around its perimeter. Trailing pretty much one side of the square is the town hall, it can be seen from the surrounding streets for when you get lost, because you probably will. We ran right through here, but returned when time was less important.

For the nights out, Bar Crawl rue du Marché au Charbon houses most of the bars worth visiting, and cuts through the gay quarter of the centre.

Our first stop was MP3 Discobar, and with that name ,we simply had to go. It’s good advertising, as we arrived the bar was lit, via some lighter fluid and a metal gutter. The bar’s residents roared, and the music continued, ranging from obscure polish hits, to Nineties ‘classics‘. Exactly what we wanted from a night out on holiday. Nothing quite like a fire-lit bar to get your friends dancing like fools on said bar, so we stayed until the morning.

The bar backed out into a seedy dance floor with a confusing range of clientele, from girls perhaps just underage, to men certainly overage for the place. So, similar to anywhere else in the world.

Flexing my linguistic muscles, I attempted to shout the order to the barwomen, but beyond the music, it barely registers “Pardon?”

I repeat, and she replies with: “Four beers?”, I nod and resign myself to the role of Brit-on-tour.

Brussels is officially a bi-lingual area, meaning both French and Flemish are official languages. But you don’t learn Flemish that often in the British education system. We found that most people you need to communicate with will also have mastered English, so being a stupid Englishman didn’t complicate the trip at all.

With the metro system, there’s no need for car rental either, and if there is truly nothing to do, or at least you can’t agree on anything, the cinemas screen films English. The second day began with a well-deserved lie-in, and we then set off to…shop.

Brussels seems to be H&M central, housing three on one street, excessive to say the least. But attempting to eat out bought its own entertainment as one place advertised its ‘average’ EURO 3 menu . We didn’t stay to taste the meal’s mediocrity, but pushed towards what is known as the kebab street.

Yes, a street filled with kebab shops, which seems to have taken a semi-cuisine status here with many streets having kebab outlets where there would typically be a newsagents, I couldn’t stomach it due to bad experiences in the past of kebab meals, and settled for a hot-dog.

But still no waffles, the second day ended with still no satisfaction for my sweet tooth.

The last day of our stay focussed on The Royal Military Museum don’t know why we went there. I think the History students outweighed everyone else. So there we were.

As it was based on war, it held your interest for a while, but then, like any other war museum visited on MANDATORY school trips, it became all quite samey. It probably didn’t help to sulk because went to a war museum and not the comic one. No justice, but at least it wasn’t about lace.

But there was a good bit, and we were able to scale the dramatic arch which marks the entrance to the museum. Though spring fog was stuck to the ground, we were able to see around the whole city and, oddly for a capital, more people and trees than cars.


Though only staying around for a few days, there is plenty to do, and though it may not seem as risqué as the Eastern European destinations, there is the ability to do and see more, and an increased chance of talking with locals. Instead of the waffles promised, I settled for chocolate, another Belgian specialty, but it’s not the same, and I’ll be returning soon to demand my waffles.

Film: Waiting

In the cinema, the trailers were not a good sign. The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift, (Another sequel for those who use Max Power as a combustion-based jizz-mag), Stay Alive (Computer game comes to life, but you have to… stay alive!) and Click, a Bruce Almighty-ish vehicle for Adam Sandler involving a universal remote, but he hasn’t scored a critical goal since The Waterboy. Uh oh, this must be the target demographic...
You expect a gross-out comedy, and well, it will do half the job, but not the half one you really wanted.
Waiting… (the dots included) is about a sub-standard steak house, and crams a whole day in the life of the dozen or so employees, book-ended by the end-of-day parties. In rawk frat-house style.
As a poor trainee is given the tour and the training, he’s also drawn into the restaurant’s self-styled game of genital puppetry, ranging from ‘the bat-wing’ to ‘the goat’. Fortunately for sensitive audiences, there’s only a few testicle shots. But, they are there.
Ryan Reynolds takes the lead, as a self-appointed ring-leader of the waiting circus, and comes across as so smug that he may just implode from the gravitational pull of his own self-worship. Teen comedy veteran Anna Faris vamps around as the generic slut and barely gets the chance to crack a joke, which is odd, and a waste.
The film is all hearty man-laughs, testicle surprises, sleeping with school-girls anecdotes, “…don’t know what to do with my life” angst, and soon becomes repetitive arrogant trash.
They have attempted to cram a film about a restaurant into a very strict template snatched from Clerks. (Which is even name-checked in the credits, several characters are all but cloned from it.)
But deep in there is the seed of what could have became an interesting comedy. The conversations aren’t as stupid as American Pie, and there’s a lot more of them, but the set pieces and gross-outs aren’t as surprising, either and just aren’t funny enough.
The rule is; don’t piss off people who prepare food for you, they even mention it in the film, but you know that already, and if you have seen the trailer, you have seen the funniest parts already.
If Waiting... was a teen-based dessert it’d be plain vanilla ice cream, with a pubic side.

Film: Silent Hill

Horror films are all about the irrational. Weepy victims struggle upstairs to escape cutlery-armed maniacs, or decide to take relaxing showers as the mentally-unbalanced hunt them down...
It isn’t long before panicky mum Rose falls into the laws of horror-land, arrested for speeding by a policewoman, and then cornered by a lumpy torso that pleasantly spits acid at the pair.
The cop fires off several shots as the acid burns through her helmet and jacket. Rose, hand-cuffed at the time, judges the situation completely wrong and decides to leg it into the greyish distance.
She’s running into Silent Hill, a miserable town that occasionally morphs from foggy Nowheresville into a rusty, bodily-fluid-drenched hell-hole. As walls and floors flake away around the poor woman, she runs and screams around the town looking for her daughter. It’s only going to get worse, mind, as mutant torsos, barbequed kids, and zombie nurses with pneumatic cleavages all have it in for her. Everything sounds angry, everything feels claustrophobic. But when anyone opens their mouths, they ruin everything.
Screenscribe Roger Avary, has the credentials. A co-writer of Pulp Fiction, gasp, but it seems he didn’t bother to try. Dialogue is hackneyed, and spoils any of the isolation and panic the film attempts building up. As everything draws to a conclusion, speeches turn into sanctimonious bollocks.
Radha Mitchell, the film’s lead, does concerned-mum-in-danger adequately, but it’s not the role of anyone’s career, and there isn’t much here to push any of the actors, as the film seems intent on communicating most of the fear through lavish sets and computer-generated threats. Everything does look beautiful, in a rotting flesh, sado-masochistic way and faithful to its computer game roots.
Unfortunately, as with many games to film adaptations, what typically suffers is the story. The games are famed for their knowing twists and shocks, but these fail to appear in the cinema. With whatever residual story left, it soon gets bogged down in its own mythology, focusing on witch-burning and blind faith, and it’s all been done before, and done better. It misses out on the more interesting characters, such as the policewoman and seems more concerned with forcing deep and meaningfuls into what soon becomes a predictable but ridiculous plot.
If the first half of the film is terse, quiet and isolating, the second is flabby, overindulgent tripe. The violence is cranked up to eleven, and enough barbed-wire to make B&Q blush is abused for several creative/excessive deaths.
Struggling to include parts of several games into one film, different ideas rattle around, and it all gets too messy and confusing. Scenes of the husband’s search for his missing wife and daughter have been included only to prop up an ending that doesn’t make sense. Nearing the end, mystified audiences are helped with a tenuously linked plot summary, but even that struggles to explain what just happened in this horror guff.

Film: Hard Candy

No, it isn’t Haley-Joel Osmond the glossy-eyed child from A.I. with a vest-top on. This is a film even more sinister than that dubious image, and nothing, read, nothing will make the manly half of the audience wince more than what little Hayley is going to do to the predatory Jeff, who could charm a snake off a plane.

As they begin to tango around each other’s feelings and expectations, I felt ill in the cinema. He’s doing something very bad, but she’s out for his blood.

The film drags along, and most of the middle it is torturous exposition- but in a literal and agreeable way. There are questions that still hang. Is Hayley a few coffees short of a Starbucks? Is he even a paedophile? If so, isn’t it illegal for a paedophile to be played by anything less than a bloated shadow of a 50 year-old man?

Ellen Page does a disturbingly good job playing the calculating adolescent in this power-twist-power game. It doffs its cap to Audition, the Japanese super-horror classic, but isn’t as primal, and you’ll never be certain which of them has the upper hand.

Sadly it also begins to make you frenetically clutch at what plot-twist is coming next. As it descends into desperation, you wait for one more surprise, but there isn’t, or if there is, it was too minor to notice.

One of them will get their way. However, you may not see it coming....